I’ve noticed that a lot of women seem really like to like psychoanalyzing men and calling them “insecure” if they don’t like women that are promiscuous, hyperindependent, etc. Isn’t some degree of insecurity rational? You wouldn’t chastise an unemployed or precariously employed worker for being insecure about an unstable labor market. Sure, if these insecurities get in the way of a current relationship and they aren’t reasonable insecurities I can understand how this could be a problem. However, when there are manosphere channels with hundreds of thousands of men following them precisely over these insecurities, doesn’t that lend some credence to these insecurities being valid in some way or another?