A man describes a dating struggle :loneliness, manipulation, financial exploitation, rejection. And within the first few responses, someone brings up rape.

"Well at least you're not being raped."

"Women are not obligated to sleep with anyone."

The subtext is always the same: your problem doesn't matter because women's safety is worse.

those conversations don't intersect. A man talking about being financially exploited in dating isn't making a claim about sexual obligation. A man describing loneliness isn't denying that women face violence. You are so focused about every man wanting to f*** that you deny us opportunity to feel as humans in conversations.

every male problem gets filtered through a rape lens. It's like the only way women can discuss male struggles is by contextualizing them as "less bad than assault."

Using rape as a conversation-ender is childish. It's a way to say "your problem is invalid because women's problem is worse" without having to engage with what you actually said.Bringing up rape doesn't address the first point,it just dismisses it by ranking suffering..

Let men discuss their dating experiences without forcing a rape comparison into it.Those are real conversations worth having. But they're different conversations.

You can believe both:

Women face real threats of sexual violence

Men face real struggles in dating

Neither invalidates the other. But you can't discuss one without centering the other.