I will start off with a very based quote from Michel Houellebecq, a renowned French author:

In societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization. Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as `the law of the market'. In an economic system where unfair dismissal is prohibited, every person more or less manages to find their place. In a sexual system where adultery is prohibited, every person more or less manages to find their bed mate. In a totally liberal sexual system certain people have a varied and exciting erotic life; others are reduced to masturbation and solitude. Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. […] Certain people win on both levels; others lose on both.

However, I will take this even further regarding the societal implications of the sexual revolution. As Houellebecq stated, modern society essentially operates on two hierarchies: the socioeconomic hierarchy, and the sexual hierarchy.

The socioeconomic hierarchy has always been brutal and capitalistic, but with the advent of modern advances in technology, it has become far more closely tied to societal contribution. In the free market today, money is primarily rewarded to people who create value in society, which incentivizes productivity and innovation as well as for people to be functioning, law-abiding citizens. While the free economic marketplace does have many problems (e.g. extreme wealth inequality, exploitation of workers, etc), it has had a massive net benefit to society overall.

On the other hand, a free sexual marketplace has precisely the opposite effect. With the sexual market being liberalized, the same market dynamics that apply to the economic apply to the sexual market as well; but in contrast to the economic market, value in the sexual market is primarily tied to genetic worth and entirely orthogonal to societal contribution. In fact, there is a plethora of statistics showing that sexual success is negatively correlated to societal contribution, which is not at all a surprise upon looking at the dysfunctional behaviors rewarded in the sexual marketplace.

Finally, as sexual liberation continues to grow more pervasive throughout society (and the world), we continue to witness greater emphasis placed on the sexual hierarchy over the socioeconomic hierarchy. Even without cultural conditioning, it would make sense for this to occur, as the socioeconomic hierarchy is tied primarily to the satiation of socially conditioned needs, while the sexual hierarchy is tied to primal, biological needs. But with the influence of the hypersexualized Western media, this difference is greatly magnified, which is only a further detriment to the state of society. Indeed, one can simply witness the degeneracy of American culture, where (for instance) players and fuckboys are celebrated while shy, awkward programmers are mocked and demonized.

So to sum everything up, I am making the point that the liberation of the sexual market has led to a massive reduction in the incentivization of functional behavior and societal contribution among men, as well as a culture of degeneracy and depravity. And as sexual liberation grows more pervasive, this trend will only be further exacerbated.