It is RP common doctrine that women, unregulated, will attempt to optimize hypergamy even in elder less fertile years. It said that if she has a taste of a HV man, she will compare every male thereafter to a HV man, and refuse to settle until a man comes along with equal or greater parity. Some women see writing on the wall and just settle for practical or reproductive reasons. However there are women that refuse to settle, in fact they perfectly content on raising an alpha seed alone rather than a having a intact beta family. Some women will not have children at all until they find “the right guy”. Not all of women of course- but enough of them.

HV polygamist men usually settle as a matter of practicality or logic. Men hit a wall too, they get exhausted and slow down and settle. Men in general settle for lack of options for same practical and reproductive reasons. Men usually don’t have same hypergamous pressure telling them make sure Women A is better than Women Z. In fact there many celebrity men u see settling with women that appear to be less attractive, less wealthy than previous GFs

Now we have this prom room situation where unmated men and unmated women are in a giant room staring at each other in perpetuity. Even tho there are available mates right there, soo many women refuse to “meet in the middle”. What is the fate of these women? Will they suffer in single mom purgatory? Will cuckholdry rise and normalize? Will Taxes and culture adapt more to favor single moms? Will they become “fem cels”? Will we see a rise in female only retirement homes? What about when they reach elder years? If they don’t have replacement children, who will fund their old age expenses, (that goes for men too)? I don’t think its as simple as “die alone”. There has to greater and more detailed implications for this matting behavior go forward in the future.