We see a lot of discussion around here about the female dual mating strategy (Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks), yet we seldom see any commentary about what the red pill says about male nature and male sexual strategy. So let's touch on that today!

And before anyone tells me "this doesn't exist in the red pill!": Yes it does, yes it does, and yes it does. All from either r/TheRedPill or r/RedPillWomen.

The two sexual goals for men

As red pill is an evo-pysch theory about gendered differences in sexual strategy, let's start with this. Male sperm is cheap, plentiful, and easily replenished. In contrast, female ovum are a valuable limited resource. From this we have the general male and female nature that are the core of the red pill: men want to reproduce with as many women as he can, while women want to find the best partner to reproduce with. And, because women have the more limited valuable resource, men compete for access to women (the peacock struts for the peahen, and whoever has the biggest, prettiest feathers will be chosen).

This leaves us with 2 male sexual goals and strategies:

1. Because men naturally crave sexual variety and access to many women (polygyny), he will choose sexually available women who will allow him to do this without him having to commit to her. Whether a man acts on this is left to the individual, but the red pill supposes that this urge exists in the vast majority of men even if they choose not to engage in this.
2. Because men compete with others, a man will also want to give his time, protection, and provision to a woman he deems "high quality" enough to ensure her safety and care, as well as the safety and care of his children.

Basically, fucking lots of women = more children, and getting married = some of these children are guaranteed to thrive and are better suited to pass on his genetic lineage.

The Madonna and the whore

The Whore. Because the male lizard brain (hehe) wants as much sex as possible, they are sexually attracted to women who look promiscuous and exhibit sexual openness/adventurousness, regardless of whether these women are actually high-n or not (so let's not make this a conversation about n-count!). And they will choose these women especially for short-term dating and casual sex.

The Madonna. On the other side, we also know that men value virtue and modesty for family formation, especially for long-term relationships and serious commitment (sometimes to the detriment of their sex lives in the long run), i.e. "Can't make a hoe into a housewife."

There is a reason Instagram models, Only Fans girls, and party girls in revealing clothing get the most attention and thirsting from men. These are the women who are sexually attractive to them, even in spite of any perceived promiscuity. The girls who wear turtle necks and long skirts, the girls who exercise modesty, are effectively invisible to the male sexual eye.

As a result, men are ok with pumping and dumping women whose bodies and aesthetics they objectify, denigrating them and calling them sluts/whores, but still want to sleep with many of them.

The male desire for both in one woman, and his resentment for all other women

In the man's ideal world his wife will exhibit a balance of both the Madonna and the whore, similar to how women want a balance of Alpha/Beta traits in men. If that terminology makes you roll your eyes, just remember what this subreddit is called, and that this means women want men to be both sexually exciting (Alpha traits) and also provide enough stability to carry a relationship (Beta traits).

But just as men say women want "the impossible" of a handsome, highly desirable man who will choose to be committed to her, men also want what is unlikely: they want women who will feel sexual shame and disgust for all other men except for himself. That she will be lustful and sexually adventurous, but reject all other men until she finds him.

But what happens when men cannot find both qualities in the same woman? When men get with a woman he deems to be "the whore" due to her highly sexualized nature, he resents her for "beta buxxing" him, and often experiences retroactive jealousy.

And when they get with a woman who only displays "the Madonna," they resent her for being frigid, sexually closed off from him, and especially resent that she requires special treatment in order for her to want sex with him (dates, waiting for commitment, "being a dancing monkey," etc.).

Women should protect themselves from male resentment

• Be exceedingly choosy with men and stay away from men who place great value onto purity or modesty, especially if you notice him calling other women whores/sluts/304s/etc.
• Date men who are less likely to experience retroactive jealousy. This means confident, self-assured men who know and believe that you chose him because you are attracted to him.
• If a man is overly interested in your romantic or sexual history, leave him.
• If a man expresses disgust at your sexual interests (especially if they are mild), leave him.
• If a man cannot understand that you want dates and romance in order to have sex with him, leave him.