And it's starting to be reflected on the birth rates and the longterm bachelorhood of men in the most equal, egalitarian and feminist welfare states of Northern Europe as has been reported by the BBC last week:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp81ynn7r4mo

A 2021 study in Norway found that the rate of male childlessness was 72% among the lowest five percent of earners, but only 11% among the highest earners – a gap that had widened by almost 20 percentage points over the previous 30 years.

[...] For some, this is a choice. For others, it is the result of biological infertility, which affects one in seven heterosexual couples in the UK. For many more like Robin, it’s something else, a confluence of factors – which can include lack of resources, financial struggles, or failing to meet the right person at the right time. Some refer to this as “social infertility”.

Like marriage, having a child was once seen as a cornerstone event, something young people did as they embarked on adult life. Now, says Professor Rotkirch, it’s seen as a capstone event – what you do once other goals have been achieved.

In Finland, the wealthiest women are the least likely to end up childless involuntarily, whereas low-income men are the most likely. That’s a big shift from the past. Historically, people from poorer families tended to transition to adulthood earlier – they left education, got jobs and started families at a younger age.

For men, financial uncertainty has a compounding impact on involuntary childlessness. It has been called “the selection effect” by sociologists, where women tend to look for someone of the same social class or above when they choose a partner.

Women are outperforming men in education in 70% of countries worldwide, leading to what Yale sociologist Marcia Inhorn has called “the mating gap”. In Europe, it means that men without a university degree are the group most likely to be childless.

Despite what many women and blue pillers claim, progressive western welfare states still have traditional gender norms. Educated women in progressive welfare states are dating men who are high earning than themselves, and many aren't tolerating working class or lower earning men in their dating lives and would much rather delay motherhood and marriage just to share a high status man or wait for one to divorce, which is leading to working class men having large disparity in childlessness as they age than men of previous generations.

This is happening despite these societies having heavily subsidised childcare, housing, family support programs and decent living standards.

Traditional gender norms persists in progressive societies. The male primary breadwinner role is here to stay even if many men arent able to fulfill those ideals as a result of the changes in our economy and feminism bridging the success gap and surpassing men. Feminists are in denial of the fact that the majority of women when given the material comforts and security of a welfare stare and a feminist upbringing will continue to seek out men with higher status than themselves.

Now let's bring this back to the election of Trump. Working class men would rather exist in a poorer performing economy where male led manufacturing has a greater role in the economy, exemplified by Trump vision to turn the clocks back to the ages of mercantilism and protected markets than exist in a richer society where services, dominated by women are the biggest generator of wealth. Because this will have an impact on their dating prospects and social lives.

They are less disposable in a world that Trumps wants to create, even if leads to greater poverty levels, as women have shown to be incapable of adapting their hypergamous standards and need for male gender roles faster than the changes taking place in the roles of men. Ironically, women are failing to adapt to new gender norms and lower class men of all races are incressingly turning reactionary and populist as a result. I anticipate Trumpism will persist as long as this issue